RESUMO
A 10-year-old Turkish boy with consanguineous parents was presented with a disproportionately short stature and a nephrotic syndrome. The mild form of Schimke's immuno-osseous dysplasia was diagnosed as the common cause. This rare, autosomal recessive osteochondrodysplasia is characterised by spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, facial dysmorphism, T-cell immunodeficiency and progressive renal failure due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. In Schimke's immuno-osseous dysplasia, a severe early-onset form and a milder later-onset form can be distinguished on the basis of the clinical course. The patient was treated by fluid and salt restriction, enalapril and later also losartan, which led to a decrease in the proteinuria and an increase in serum albumin concentration. Two years later, the renal function was still normal.
Assuntos
Osso e Ossos/anormalidades , Síndrome Nefrótica/etiologia , Osteocondrodisplasias/complicações , Osteocondrodisplasias/genética , Estatura/genética , Criança , Consanguinidade , Humanos , Nefropatias/etiologia , Nefropatias/prevenção & controle , Linfopenia/etiologia , Linfopenia/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Síndrome Nefrótica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Nefrótica/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of antihypertensive drugs on the absorption of subcutaneously injected insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers (group 1) were given 1 mg/kg body wt propranolol three times a day during 48 h and a single dose on the morning of investigation. Seven other healthy volunteers (group 2) were given 10 mg nifedipine 30 min before subcutaneous injection of 10 U 125I-labeled soluble insulin. Absorption was measured by counting radioactivity externally. In both groups, control experiments were conducted under the same conditions without administration of propranolol or nifedipine. RESULTS: Propranolol usage was associated with higher mean percentages of remaining activity (P less than 0.05 by analysis of variance [ANOVA]) than in the control experiment. In the nifedipine experiment, mean percentages were significantly lower compared with the control experiment (P less than 0.02 by ANOVA). The mean decline in activity of all 30-min periods was 6.8 +/- 3.5 vs. 3.6 +/- 3.7% for control versus propranolol (group 1) (P less than 0.05) and 6.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 9.6 +/- 3.2% for control versus nifedipine (group 2) (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive drugs can influence insulin absorption. Propranolol (a peripheral vasoconstrictor) decreases insulin absorption, whereas nifedipine (a vasodilatator) increases insulin absorption.